If that’s D**** ***k***** you’re interviewing she’s an incredibly unreliable source and has a history of trouble following her around with stories subsequently being massively exaggerated.
After we published the latest claims against Binsar Simorangkir- which included tyre-slashing, assault and battery, racist taunts of “bule” to staff and, incredibly, claims that he asked a teacher if her boyfriend would perform a contract killing for cash- we received the comment above in the box to this website. We have, of course, deleted most of the letters in her name to conceal her identity. But it is a very revealing post nonetheless.
As we already said in our last post, one has to wonder who has a motive to want to discredit witnesses at this point. The only real person with a motive is Binsar, Luke or other TBI senior managers. The grammar is perfect and it reads as if it were written by a Native Speaker. It also has a phoney, slick feel as if it were written by a practiced liar. The real giveaway though is this poster knows the full name of the only former Bekasi expat teacher who is female. Would the current VKU teachers know her name? Not a chance. The only person who would know that is Head Office and the only expat manager there is Luke Preece. How could it be anyone but him or one of his moles?
It is such a stupid post because it completely flies in the face of their 18 month long denial of the TBI Bekasi scandal. After alleging that we “made up” the whole scandal and saying these victims did not even exist, now they admit that they know their names! How dumb are they really? They honestly expect people to forget that they were alleging no one supported us and all the TBI Bekasi victims were fakes but now they admit that they actually knew the names of these former victims all along. The fact that they think they know who the interviewee is proves:
1) They know the victims were real
2) They know their names (possibly to make sure they don’t get into a TBI school as spies)
3) They lied for a long time that no one supported us when they knew the victims were real
4) They deliberately set out to deceive existing staff by denying knowledge of Binsar’s reign of terror
Of course some of Luke’s VKU second-class teachers are happy for the money even if they are working for lying scoundrels, but it’s pretty bad news for a company which is now into its 3rd year of a teacher recruitment crisis. Pathological lying to teachers about what TBI really is is not going to solve their image problem.
tbilanguageschool 
If that’s D**** ***k***** you’re interviewing she’s an incredibly unreliable source and has a history of trouble following her around with stories subsequently being massively exaggerated.
If that were true then all witnesses coming out of TBI Bekasi would also be unreliable and exaggerating their claims no? Is that the twisted logic?
Who should we believe? The lying TBI mafia who change their story and keep digging themselves a bigger grave or the story of some individuals who claim to have experienced the same thing at the same place under the same manager, during and at different times within 2 years?
I think the readers know and are not stupid and this smokescreen by Luke and his goon squad is just another bungling attempt to cover the truth..
Since yesterday the TBI Mafia have been claiming that the new witness has been black-listed at EF for aggressive behavior. Is this true? We know that when Cam checked the reference at EF Tebet for Colm O’Mahony (one of TBI’s most hypocritical defenders- he broke his contract with them himself!!!) they strongly advised against hiring him at TBI too. If bad press from EF is anything to go by, no one should believe TBI’s mouthiest defender either.
Anyway, TBI has long claimed that we “invented” the TBI Bekasi victims. Now they are real but unreliable? To make this claim is a covert admission they were lying that we had made up the TBI Bekasi victims ourselves. They ain’t too bright, it seems.